Yukon River 2002 Data Analysis

Map of Yukon River drainage

Sampling site: between the Dalton Highway Bridge and the USGS Stevens Village hydrological station

![map](image/Yukon/map of Yukon River.jpg)

Daily Discharge and Sampling Date

![daily discharge](image/Yukon/Daily discharge.jpg)

Monthly integrated discharge

![monthly discharge](image/Yukon/Monthly integrated.jpg)

Precipitation

Precipitation

Three fluorescence components by PARAFAC Analysis-revised

three components

Excitation and emission maximum

ComponentsEx max (nm)Em max (nm)Property
C1240/315432Humic-like
C2260/365494Humic-like
C3<240/295374Humic-like

LMW-DOM-COM

Fluorescence components ratios

![](image/Yukon/components ratio.jpg)

Normalized PARAFAC components-DOM

Component percentage

Normalized PARAFAC components-COM

Component percentage

Normalized PARAFAC components-LMW

Component percentage

Figure 6 from Guo et al.

![fig6guo](image/Yukon/Fig6 from Guo.jpg)

S275-295 vs %C1, C2, C3

![](image/Yukon/Correlation between S275-295vsC1-C3-2.jpg)

DOM
COM analysis
LMW

Hydrodynamic diameters distribution of colloids in the Yukon River upper stream in 2002.

UV1

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Hydrodynamic diameter (nm) UV1 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

UV2

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Hydrodynamic diameter (nm) UV2 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

Fluorescence 1 -

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Hydrodynamic diameter (nm) FLD1 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

Fluorescence 2 -

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Hydrodynamic diameter (nm) FLD2 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

size distribution (molecular weights)

UV1

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Molecular weights(kDa) UV1 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

UV2

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Molecular weights(kDa) UV2 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

Fluorescence 1 (Ex/Em = 350 nm /450 nm)

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Molecular weights(kDa) FLD1 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

Fluorescence 2 (Ex/Em = 275 nm/ 340 nm)

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Molecular weights(kDa) FLD2 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

Integrations of each size intervals - Size distribution of colloidal organic matter

UV1

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Integrations of each size intervals nm UV1 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

UV2

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Integrations of each size intervals nm UV2 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

Fluorescence 1 (Ex/Em = 350 nm /450 nm)

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Integrations of each size intervals nm FLD1 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

Fluorescence 2 (Ex/Em = 275 nm/ 340 nm)

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Integrations of each size intervals nm FLD2 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

Integrations of size intervals - size distribution of colloids in molecular weights

UV1

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Integrations of each size intervals Da UV1 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

UV2

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Integrations of each size intervals Da UV2 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

Fluorescence 1 (Ex/Em = 350 nm /450 nm)

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Integrations of each size intervals Da FLD1 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

Fluorescence 2 (Ex/Em = 275 nm/ 340 nm)

![](image/Yukon/Multiple samples - Integrations of each size intervals Da FLD2 Yukon 01 COM.jpg)

Total data

Sample_Namea254SUVAS275-295TOCTNDOC/TNWeightCarbon percentageNitrogen percentageMCHO%MCHO
m-1m-1/uMnm-1(uM)(uM)mg%%(uM-C)%
YR_<1kDa16.350.060.021114.683.830.23.014.570.1814.8512.95
YR_<1kDa24.190.050.03276.363.7720.253.622.530.1513.6417.86
YR_<1kDa32.040.050.0538.033.2911.553.361.360.1413.1834.65
YR_<1kDa42.30.050.05348.391.6229.943.081.890.0715.6632.36
YR_<1kDa52.860.050.04657.512.8520.193.112.220.1316.8929.37
YR_<1kDa62.750.060.04550.031.9725.453.711.620.076.2912.57
YR_DOM17.610.070.014101.643.0333.532.954.130.1421.4321.08
YR_DOM24.770.070.01465.013.2819.793.242.410.1416.0324.65
YR_DOM34.610.110.01741.942.5316.553.961.270.0912.5329.87
YR_DOM45.910.150.01638.222.0818.423.161.450.095.815.18
YR_DOM55.270.110.01747.442.5618.513.621.570.116.3934.55
YR_DOM63.360.090.01537.381.9219.472.981.510.098.9824.01
YR_COM139.530.130.024311.897.0144.51.9119.60.51105.8333.93
YR_COM258.460.120.028490.1311.4442.833.3217.720.48141.0828.78
YR_COM321.760.110.025200.245.6335.571.6714.390.4755.4827.71
YR_COM424.830.110.019220.325.3141.461.7914.770.4273.6133.41
YR_COM516.230.120.026138.854.3332.031.6510.10.3755.4439.92
YR_COM635.580.110.033320.396.549.292.9513.030.3181.2325.35
Sample_NameFIXBIXHIX%FIX%BIX%HIXC1C2C3%C1%C2%C3
YR_<1kDa11.340.597.510.010.010.075.42115.40211.3690.0470.1340.099
YR_<1kDa21.30.496.750.020.010.093.91212.0888.3240.0340.1050.073
YR_<1kDa31.280.595.330.030.020.141.8185.2893.7170.0160.0460.032
YR_<1kDa41.310.595.580.030.010.121.7344.9993.5660.0150.0440.031
YR_<1kDa51.250.527.220.020.010.132.065.4724.2630.0180.0480.037
YR_<1kDa61.340.585.580.030.010.112.1355.7254.4140.0190.050.038
YR_DOM11.370.617.580.010.010.075.35315.20510.9790.0470.1330.096
YR_DOM21.320.563.690.020.010.063.99712.7368.3040.0350.1110.072
YR_DOM31.310.636.480.030.020.152.5867.115.3650.0230.0620.047
YR_DOM41.30.565.040.030.010.131.9795.9274.1730.0170.0520.036
YR_DOM51.260.584.810.030.010.12.6837.2115.5050.0230.0630.048
YR_DOM61.340.595.820.040.020.161.9935.1814.1260.0170.0450.036
YR_COM11.030.3913.66000.0423.41224.31934.7650.2040.2120.303
YR_COM21.060.4215.09000.0335.49835.18649.0290.310.3070.428
YR_COM31.040.4413.720.0100.0714.18517.10722.4090.1240.1490.195
YR_COM41.090.4814.91000.0716.13917.39625.8850.1410.1520.226
YR_COM51.090.4712.620.0100.0910.17911.37516.7130.0890.0990.146
YR_COM61.090.4916.2000.0524.49224.34436.7930.2140.2120.321

Figures from literatures

![data](image/Yukon/Basic data.jpg) ![data2](image/Yukon/Basic data2.jpg) ![data3](image/Yukon/Basic data3.jpg)

DOC&CHO Concentration

![doc](image/Yukon/DOC table.jpg) ![doc2](image/Yukon/DOC table2.jpg)

DOC HMW & LMW

![DOC1](image/Yukon/DOC figure.jpg)

Variations of dissolved organic carbon in the HMW (1kDa–0.45 um) and the LMW (<1kDa) fractions

CHO MCHO&TCHO

![CHO](image/Yukon/CHO figure.jpg)

Concentrations of carbohydrate species, including monosaccharides (MCHO) and polysaccharides (PCHO), in the <0.45 um DOM fraction.

Comparison of HMW and LMW

Fig6a
Fig7

Comparison btw/ Fig 2 from Zou et al. and Fig 4 from Guo et al.

Fig2
Fig4

Fig 4 from Zou et al.

Fig4

Fig 5 from Zou et al.

Fig5

DOC POC DIC

Fig1

Isotope Information

isotioe

Isotope source difference

isotope source

Edit this page

Dr. Hui Lin (林辉)
Dr. Hui Lin (林辉)
Assistant Researcher

My research interests include Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM) in natural waters, marine chemistry using isotope methodology and freshwater sciences.

Related